Is Donald Trump the Obama Presidential Center鈥檚 Most Unexpected Ally?
On January 16, 2020, the City of Chicago and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released a revised with a laundry list of negative impacts鈥攖echnically known as 鈥渁dverse effects鈥濃攖hat the Obama Presidential Center (OPC) would have on the Olmsted-designed Jackson Park and Midway Plaisance. The assessment is part of a required federal review pursuant to , triggered in part because the parks are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Under normal circumstances, the FHWA, the lead federal agency in the OPC review process, would now seek to avoid, minimize, or mitigate those adverse effects. But instead, the agency is creatively applying a Trump-era policy position鈥攁s yet unapproved changes to the National Environmental Policy Act, noted below鈥攖o ignore the OPC鈥檚 harm to the parkland. Between the lines of the otherwise wonkish and technical federal assessment is the stunning irony that the OPC鈥檚 proponents are relying on the Trump Administration鈥檚 pro-deregulatory posture to get their project built. Their cause is being aided by Fred Wagner, the former chief counsel of the FHWA during Obama鈥檚 presidency, whom the Obama Foundation has hired to help navigate the federal reviews.

The assessment states that the OPC would harm 鈥渟pecific elements of the historic district,鈥 further impacting 鈥渉ow Jackson Park and the Midway Plaisance reflect conscious decisions made by the Olmsted firm in determining spatial organization, relationships between major features, views, patterns of circulation, arrangement of vegetation, and hierarchy of buildings and other constructed features.鈥
In addition, the OPC would have an adverse effect on the Chicago Parks and Boulevard System Historic District because it will 鈥渁lter, directly and indirectly, characteristics of one portion of the district that qualify it for inclusion in the National Register.鈥 Notably, the stark, monolithic OPC tower would also diminis